|
3rd Class – 40-49%
|
Lower 2nd – 50-59%
|
Upper 2nd – 60-69%
|
1st Class – 70%+
|
Knowledge and understanding of subject matter
(30%)
|
Adequate grasp of knowledge on the role culture can play in building one’s identity but with evident shortcomings by not having examples and reasons.
Basic understanding of the subject matter with inconsistencies in answering the questions.
|
Good grasp of knowledge demonstrated on how culture can play a role in one identity by referring to basic theory on the subject.
Good understanding of the subject matter but may be limited with examples and reasons and with some inaccuracy in answering the reflective questions.
|
Very good breadth and depth of knowledge demonstrated on how culture can play a role in one identity by using a range of theories on the subject.
Very good understanding of the subject matter and its terminology with examples and reasons.
|
Excellent breadth and depth of knowledge demonstrated on culture can play a role in one identity by using a wide range of theories on the subject.
Excellent understanding of the subject matter and its terminology with examples and reasons in great depth.
|
Interpretation and evaluation of subject material
(30%)
|
Adequate grasp of knowledge but with evident shortcomings on reflective writing. Showing little attempt of reflective writing without using a reflective model like Gibbs.
|
Good grasp of knowledge demonstrated on reflective writing with reference made to a reflective model without application of all stages. Some Justification on feelings and thoughts being expressed.
|
Very good breadth and depth of knowledge demonstrated in application of a reflective model. Attempts made to apply each stage of the model to the questions. Justification and analysis provided for each question with reference to feelings, thoughts, and outcomes.
|
Excellent breadth and depth of knowledge demonstrated in application of a reflective model. All the stages of the model have been applied in great depth. Justification and analysis provided for each question with reference to feelings, thoughts, and outcomes.
|
Structure, Presentation and Layout
(20%)
|
Basic layout of a reflective diary with minimum attempt to use visual aids to present information. Minimum use of paragraph, headings, and subheadings with an adequate structure of writing.
|
Good layout of a reflective diary with attempt made to use visual aids to present information. With the use of paragraph, headings, and subheadings with a good structure of writing.
|
Very good breadth and depth of knowledge demonstrated in the layout of a reflective diary with good use of visual aids to present information. With paragraphs, headings, and subheading with an attractive overall structure with some grammar and spelling mistake
|
Excellent breadth and depth of knowledge demonstrated in the layout of a reflective diary with excellent use of visual aids to present information. With paragraphs, headings and subheading used with a very attractive overall structure that is clear and no grammar and spelling mistakes.
|
Referencing, relevance and quality of research sources
(20%)
|
Basic/no attempt made for using citation and reference list. Very little attempt made to use recent sources of information up to five years old.
|
Some attempt made for using citation and reference list may not follow the Harvard system correctly. Some attempt made to use recent sources of information up to five years old.
|
Very good attempt made for using citation and reference list with little inconsistency in referencing. Use of recent and updated sources within the last five years.
|
Excellent attempt made for using citation and reference list with no inconsistency in referencing. Use of recent and updated sources within the last five years.
|