Write concise, coherent and informed arguments of how social, cultural, ethical, environmental and sustainability theory applies to digital media practise;

RELEVANT DISRUPTION & GLOBAL ENGAGMENT

Assessment 2

Disruption & Engagement

Due:                      Week 8

Weighting:             30%

Type:                     Case Study Review / Visual & Written Presentation)

Learning Outcomes:

  1. research, analyse and critically evaluate effective disruption practices;
  2. critically evaluate global cultural dynamics that impact disruption and engagement;
  3. write concise, coherent and informed arguments of how social, cultural, ethical, environmental and sustainability theory applies to digital media practise;
  4. deliver a personal perspective on relevant disruption and global engagement practice.

Description:

Research and analyse a case study of disruption with global implications that was unsuccessful in achieving its intended objective. Reflect and write a critical analysis to identify why the disruption was unsuccessful, the impact it did or did not make, including level of engagement, social, cultural, ethical, environmental & sustainability considerations with reference to theory (include citations using Harvard referencing). Describe how you would have approached it differently to deliver the desired outcome. In addition, prepare a self-reflective statement of the personal position on the project process and outcomes. Present as a visual presentation (min. 20 slides) and written presentation (2,000 words).

Details:

Students must cite at least 3 external sources and refer to these using Harvard referencing (in text citations and reference list). Also include a full bibliography.

Upload final essay as a PDF file (Word converted to PDF) and a second PDF file (PowerPoint converted to PDF) of the visual presentation to Moodle for marking.

Marking Criteria & Rubrics:

Criterion 1:

Depth of research and analysis – 40%

Fail:

Incomplete research and analysis

Pass:

Adequate but basic research and analysis

Credit:

Competent research and analysis

Distinction:

Compressive and detailed research and analysis

 

 

 

Criterion 2:

Critical evaluation of influences and impact – 20%

Fail:

Incomplete critical evaluation

Pass:

Adequate but basic critical evaluation

Credit:

Competent critical evaluation

Distinction:

Compressive and detailed critical evaluation

High Distinction

Outstanding critical evaluation

 

Criterion 3:

Personal refection – 20%

Fail:

Incomplete personal reflection

Pass:

Adequate but basic personal reflection

Credit:

Competent personal reflection

Distinction:

Compressive and detailed personal reflection

High Distinction

Outstanding and insightful personal reflection

 

Criterion 4:

Quality of presentation (incl. Referencing) – 20%

Fail:

Incomplete presentation, no references

Pass:

Adequate but basic presentation, some references

Credit:

Competent presentation with references

Distinction:

Compressive and detailed presentation, accurate references

High Distinction

Outstanding presentation, includes additional references

100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions