Order this Assignment Now: £69
Write concise, coherent and informed arguments of how social, cultural, ethical, environmental and sustainability theory applies to digital media practise;
2023-05-27T01:40:34+00:00
NOTE : Kindly share your UPDATED exam paper to the LIVE EXPERT with an updated Case Study (if any)
Assessment 2
Disruption & Engagement Type : Case Study Review / Visual & Written Presentation)
Learning Outcomes :
research, analyse and critically evaluate effective disruption practices;
critically evaluate global cultural dynamics that impact disruption and engagement;
write concise, coherent and informed arguments of how social, cultural, ethical, environmental and sustainability theory applies to digital media practise;
deliver a personal perspective on relevant disruption and global engagement practice.
Description : Research and analyse a case study of disruption with global implications that was unsuccessful in achieving its intended objective. Reflect and write a critical analysis to identify why the disruption was unsuccessful, the impact it did or did not make, including level of engagement, social, cultural, ethical, environmental & sustainability considerations with reference to theory (include citations using Harvard referencing). Describe how you would have approached it differently to deliver the desired outcome. In addition, prepare a self-reflective statement of the personal position on the project process and outcomes. Present as a visual presentation (min. 20 slides) and written presentation (2,000 words ).
Details : Students must cite at least 3 external sources and refer to these using Harvard referencing (in text citations and reference list). Also include a full bibliography. Upload final essay as a PDF file (Word converted to PDF) and a second PDF file (PowerPoint converted to PDF) of the visual presentation to Moodle for marking.
Marking Criteria & Rubrics :
Criterion 1:
Depth of research and analysis – 40%
Fail:
Incomplete research and analysis
Pass:
Adequate but basic research and analysis
Credit:
Competent research and analysis
Distinction:
Compressive and detailed research and analysis
Criterion 2:
Critical evaluation of influences and impact – 20%
Fail:
Incomplete critical evaluation
Pass:
Adequate but basic critical evaluation
Credit:
Competent critical evaluation
Distinction:
Compressive and detailed critical evaluation
High Distinction
Outstanding critical evaluation
Criterion 3:
Personal refection – 20%
Fail:
Incomplete personal reflection
Pass:
Adequate but basic personal reflection
Credit:
Competent personal reflection
Distinction:
Compressive and detailed personal reflection
High Distinction
Outstanding and insightful personal reflection
Criterion 4:
Quality of presentation (incl. Referencing) – 20%
Fail:
Incomplete presentation, no references
Pass:
Adequate but basic presentation, some references
Credit:
Competent presentation with references
Distinction:
Compressive and detailed presentation, accurate references
High Distinction
Outstanding presentation, includes additional references
The quoted price covers up to 3000 words . For custom requirements Live Chat or Whatsapp ← Click Here
Order this Assignment Now: £69
Email: care@academiasupport.co.uk
100% Plagiarism Free & Custom Written, Tailored to your instructions