Call / WhatsApp+44 7704039352

Find us:Chadderton, Oldham OL9 9PA, United Kingdom

Solutions

(a) Suggest what changes could be made to improve the existing procedure to demonstrate greater adherence to the relevant parts of the International Labour Organisation (ILO) code of practice (CoP) Safety in the Use of Chemicals at Work, section 6.5.


(d) Considering only tools, what control measures could be put in place to reduce the risks associated with vibration exposure that occur during maintenance work at FF.


In terms of vibration exposure, explain why the MM may have decided to swap the workers’ tasks.


(c) The MM has reviewed the maintenance schedule. For the afternoon, the MM has decided to swap the allocation of tasks for Workers X and Y. The morning task allocation remains unchanged.


(b) Explain why estimations of vibration exposure for Workers X and Y may not accurately reflect the actual vibration exposures.


4. (a) Using only the information in supporting documents 3 and 4, estimate the likely vibration exposure on 23 May of (i) Worker X during the whole working day.


Task 4: Hand-arm vibration (HAV) exposure


(b) Explain how FF could protect workers from the effects of the extreme thermal environments.


(i) Describe how the workers will be exposed to extreme thermal environments.


3. (a) Workers at the factory carry out tasks in extreme cold thermal environments.


Task 3: Thermal environments at the factory


2. The PLM has been advised to carry out a detailed risk assessment when assessing the pushing and pulling of the filled roll cages.


(b) Consider how the risks of exposure to Cleanse-Quat change when thorough disinfection is carried out, compared to regular disinfection.


(a) Suggest what changes could be made to improve the existing procedure to demonstrate greater compliance with the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002 (COSHH), Regulation 7(3) and 7(4).


123456>>Last