Call / WhatsApp+44 7704039352

Find us:Chadderton, Oldham OL9 9PA, United Kingdom

Solutions

DI1-0009-P2-ENG-QP-V1 Sep25 © NEBOSH 2025

Oct 10 2025 259.00

5. Comment on the benefits to Looplands of extending their current traditional approach to safety with proactive safety (Safety II).

Oct 10 2025 259.00

(b) The full external investigation found that the accident had both active and latent failures.

Oct 10 2025 259.00

4. (a) Comment on how effectively the ‘5 Whys technique’ was applied by one of the owners to investigate the accident.

Oct 10 2025 259.00

Task 4: Commenting on the ‘5 Whys’ techniques, likely active and latent failures

Oct 10 2025 259.00

(b) In the British Health and Safety Executive’s (HSE’s) guidance document ‘Health and safety training: a brief guide’ (INDG345), Step 5 ‘Check that the training has worked’ provides a framework for evaluation.

Oct 10 2025 259.00

3. (a) Giving reasons, explain under what circumstances training should be given at Looplands.

Oct 10 2025 259.00

How can Looplands demonstrate that they consider health and safety risks as equal to other business risks?

Oct 10 2025 259.00

2. An investigation into the accident has criticised the theme park for putting profit before safety.

Oct 10 2025 259.00

Task 2: Why health and safety risks must be integrated into main business risk

Oct 10 2025 259.00

(b) How can the media (print, broadcast, social) affect public perception of health and safety at Looplands after the accident?

Oct 10 2025 259.00

(a) Propose corrective actions to meet the requirements of Recommendation 10 of R164 that might prevent similar accidents.

Oct 10 2025 259.00

1. Assume that the International Labour Organisation’s (ILO’s) Occupational Safety and Health Convention 1981 (No.155) and associated Recommendation R164 – Occupational Safety and Health Recommendation, 1981 (No.164)

Oct 10 2025 259.00

Task 1: Corrective actions required at the level of undertaking, and media influence

Oct 10 2025 259.00

First <<27 28 29 30 31 32 >>Last